Home

Leadership

Management

Success at Work

About us

Stuff

Contact

Followership

Followership is all the rage today. We are encouraged to study it for two reasons. First: leadership implies followership; you're not leading if no one is following. Second: leaders and followers now work closely together. Leadership is a relationship, so the argument goes.

Advocates of followership claim that employees must be followers, otherwise there would be no leaders. But a closer look at what it means to lead shows that employees are collaborators, partners, supporters or associates, not followers.

The current push to call employees followers is a massive drag on efforts to engage them. The followership bandwagon needs to be derailed if we are to realize the full potential that employees have to offer.

Followership is a child of the illegitimate union of leadership and management. To better engage employees, this union must be severed. When we see that employees report to managers, not leaders, we can call them associates or partners and stop using the disengaging follower label.

Leadership & Management Featured

A lot of people feel that leadership isn't a role but what does it mean exactly to reject this idea? Is there any sense to...

Employee engagement surveys typically ask employees how engaged they feel in their organization or job, not how well their...

What does it mean to be an executive and how does it differ from being a manager or a leader? By defining executive as a...

We often think of leadership in terms of traits or competencies but we also have leadership models: Level 5 Leadership (Jim...

When we think about leadership we envisage being in charge of a group, not how to show leadership viewed as a discrete act....

Why do large companies continually struggle to innovate and engage employees? One of the findings of a 2002 Gallop poll was...