Home

Leadership

Management

Success at Work

About us

Contact

Followership

Followership is all the rage today. We are encouraged to study it for two reasons. First: leadership implies followership; you're not leading if no one is following. Second: leaders and followers now work closely together. Leadership is a relationship, so the argument goes.

Advocates of followership claim that employees must be followers, otherwise there would be no leaders. But a closer look at what it means to lead shows that employees are collaborators, partners, supporters or associates, not followers.

The current push to call employees followers is a massive drag on efforts to engage them. The followership bandwagon needs to be derailed if we are to realize the full potential that employees have to offer.

Followership is a child of the illegitimate union of leadership and management. To better engage employees, this union must be severed. When we see that employees report to managers, not leaders, we can call them associates or partners and stop using the disengaging follower label.

Leadership & Management Featured

The meaning of leadership is inexorably shifting from masculine to feminine, from calling the shots to engaging, coaching...

Agreement is nearly universal that leadership can be learned. If leadership means being an executive, then there are clearly...

The popular image of management is past its sell-by date, born of faulty thinking from the late 1970s. Management is long...

Organizations need employees to be more engaged to reap the benefits of their full potential. Even employees who work hard...

The ideal leader has vision, charisma, integrity, emotional intelligence, an inspiring delivery and sterling character. But...

Leadership, as normally conceived, is an intra-group phenomenon: leaders occupy roles within groups,...